On Thursday, August 01, 2013 03:15:00 PM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 8/1/2013 2:30 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 01, 2013 11:52:14 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >> On 8/1/2013 11:35 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> Okay, so if I understand everything correctly, there are no new entries
> >
On 8/1/2013 2:30 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thursday, August 01, 2013 11:52:14 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 8/1/2013 11:35 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> Okay, so if I understand everything correctly, there are no new entries in
>>> /proc relating specifically to NetLabel, XFRM, or Secmark; although
On Thursday, August 01, 2013 11:52:14 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 8/1/2013 11:35 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > Okay, so if I understand everything correctly, there are no new entries in
> > /proc relating specifically to NetLabel, XFRM, or Secmark; although there
> > are new LSM specific entries for
On 8/1/2013 11:35 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 02:21:54 PM Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 7/31/2013 12:39 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 09:22:23 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 7/30/2013 3:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:32
On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 02:21:54 PM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/31/2013 12:39 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 09:22:23 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >> On 7/30/2013 3:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:32:11 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Subjec
On 7/31/2013 12:39 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 09:22:23 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> On 7/30/2013 3:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:32:11 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
Subject: [PATCH v14 3/6] LSM: Explicit individual LSM associations
Ex
On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 09:22:23 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/30/2013 3:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:32:11 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >> Subject: [PATCH v14 3/6] LSM: Explicit individual LSM associations
> >>
> >> Expand the /proc/.../attr interface set to he
On 7/30/2013 3:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:32:11 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH v14 3/6] LSM: Explicit individual LSM associations
>>
>> Expand the /proc/.../attr interface set to help include
>> LSM specific entries as well as the traditional shared
>> "c
On Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:32:11 AM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v14 3/6] LSM: Explicit individual LSM associations
>
> Expand the /proc/.../attr interface set to help include
> LSM specific entries as well as the traditional shared
> "current", "prev" and "exec" entries. Each LSM t
On 7/29/2013 1:51 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Casey Schaufler
> wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH v14 3/6] LSM: Explicit individual LSM associations
>> [...]
>> Introduce feature specific security operation vectors
>> for NetLabel, XFRM, secmark and presentation in the
>> trad
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Casey Schaufler
wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v14 3/6] LSM: Explicit individual LSM associations
> [...]
> Introduce feature specific security operation vectors
> for NetLabel, XFRM, secmark and presentation in the
> traditional /proc/.../attr interfaces. This allows
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
