Re: [PATCH v2] arch,locking: Ciao arch_mutex_cpu_relax()

2014-08-15 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 06:18:34PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 10:42 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 15:04 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > It looks like you forgot to update frv? It's been failing on -next since > > > a > > > few days: > >

Re: [PATCH v2] arch,locking: Ciao arch_mutex_cpu_relax()

2014-08-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 08/07/2014 06:18 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 10:42 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 15:04 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: It looks like you forgot to update frv? It's been failing on -next since a few days: Anyway developers can be alerted sooner a

Re: [PATCH v2] arch,locking: Ciao arch_mutex_cpu_relax()

2014-08-07 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 10:42 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 15:04 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > It looks like you forgot to update frv? It's been failing on -next since a > > few days: Anyway developers can be alerted sooner about this (ie: while its still in -next ph

Re: [PATCH v2] arch,locking: Ciao arch_mutex_cpu_relax()

2014-08-05 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 15:04 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > It looks like you forgot to update frv? It's been failing on -next since a > few days: > > kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h:87:2: error: implicit declaration of > function 'cpu_relax_lowlatency' > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Re: [PATCH v2] arch,locking: Ciao arch_mutex_cpu_relax()

2014-08-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi David, On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > From: Davidlohr Bueso > > The arch_mutex_cpu_relax() function, introduced by 34b133f, is > hacky and ugly. It was added a few years ago to address the fact > that common cpu_relax() calls include yielding on s390, and thus > im