Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: Check for missing NULL terminators in of_device_id tables

2014-06-09 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 06/09/14 14:47, Michal Marek wrote: > Dne 3.6.2014 20:25, Julia Lawall napsal(a): >> From: Stephen Boyd >> >> Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing >> failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a >> check to make sure these tables are terminated. T

Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: Check for missing NULL terminators in of_device_id tables

2014-06-09 Thread Michal Marek
Dne 3.6.2014 20:25, Julia Lawall napsal(a): > From: Stephen Boyd > > Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing > failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a > check to make sure these tables are terminated. Thanks to Mitchel > Humpherys for coming up wi

Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: Check for missing NULL terminators in of_device_id tables

2014-06-03 Thread Julia Lawall
From: Stephen Boyd Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a check to make sure these tables are terminated. Thanks to Mitchel Humpherys for coming up with the pattern initially. Cc: Mitchel Humpherys Cc: Ju

Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: Check for missing NULL terminators in of_device_id tables

2014-06-03 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 06/03/14 11:14, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> On 06/03/14 03:15, Julia Lawall wrote: >>> Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing >>> failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a >>> check to make sure these tables

Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: Check for missing NULL terminators in of_device_id tables

2014-06-03 Thread Julia Lawall
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 06/03/14 03:15, Julia Lawall wrote: > > Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing > > failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a > > check to make sure these tables are terminated. Thanks to Mitchel > > Humph

Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: Check for missing NULL terminators in of_device_id tables

2014-06-03 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 06/03/14 03:15, Julia Lawall wrote: > Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing > failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a > check to make sure these tables are terminated. Thanks to Mitchel > Humpherys for coming up with the pattern initially. > >

Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: Check for missing NULL terminators in of_device_id tables

2014-06-03 Thread Julia Lawall
Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a check to make sure these tables are terminated. Thanks to Mitchel Humpherys for coming up with the pattern initially. Cc: Mitchel Humpherys Cc: Julia Lawall Cc: Gille

Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: Check for missing NULL terminators in of_device_id tables

2014-06-03 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, 27 May 2014 11:04:18 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing > failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a > check to make sure these tables are terminated. Thanks to Mitchel > Humpherys for coming up with the patte