Applied, thanks!
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
[Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/idle: make intel_idle.c driver more explicitly
non-modular] On 21/04/2016 (Thu 15:21) Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:44:55AM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > [Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/idle: make intel_idle.c driver more explicitly
> > non
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:44:55AM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/idle: make intel_idle.c driver more explicitly
> non-modular] On 21/04/2016 (Thu 10:04) Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:12:49PM -0400, Paul
[Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/idle: make intel_idle.c driver more explicitly
non-modular] On 21/04/2016 (Thu 10:04) Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:12:49PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > > > We replace module.h with moduleparam.h sin
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:12:49PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[ ... ]
> > > We replace module.h with moduleparam.h since the file does declare
> > > some module parameters, and leaving them as such is currently the
> > > easiest way to remain compatible with existing boot arg use cases.
> >
>
[Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/idle: make intel_idle.c driver more explicitly
non-modular] On 20/04/2016 (Wed 20:13) Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > The Kconfig for this driver is currently declared with:
> >
> &
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The Kconfig for this driver is currently declared with:
>
> config INTEL_IDLE
> bool "Cpuidle Driver for Intel Processors"
>
> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
>
> This was done in com
7 matches
Mail list logo
