Re: [PATCH v2] inet: fix possible seqlock deadlocks

2013-11-29 Thread David Miller
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:09:14 +0100 > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:51:22AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> From: Eric Dumazet >> >> In commit c9e9042994d3 ("ipv4: fix possible seqlock deadlock") I left >> another places where IP_INC_STATS_BH() were improperly used. >>

Re: Re: [PATCH v2] inet: fix possible seqlock deadlocks

2013-11-29 Thread Jongman Heo
--- Original Message --- Sender : Jongman Heo Date : 2013-11-29 11:08 (GMT+09:00) Title : Re: [PATCH v2] inet: fix possible seqlock deadlocks > > >-- Original Message --- >Sender : Eric Dumazet >Date : 2013-11-29 02:51 (GMT+09:00) >Title : [PATCH v2] inet: fi

Re: [PATCH v2] inet: fix possible seqlock deadlocks

2013-11-28 Thread Jongman Heo
-- Original Message --- Sender : Eric Dumazet Date : 2013-11-29 02:51 (GMT+09:00) Title : [PATCH v2] inet: fix possible seqlock deadlocks > > From: Eric Dumazet > > In commit c9e9042994d3 ("ipv4: fix possible seqlock deadlock") I left > another places where IP_INC_STATS_BH() were impro

Re: [PATCH v2] inet: fix possible seqlock deadlocks

2013-11-28 Thread Hannes Frederic Sowa
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:51:22AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > > In commit c9e9042994d3 ("ipv4: fix possible seqlock deadlock") I left > another places where IP_INC_STATS_BH() were improperly used. > > udp_sendmsg(), ping_v4_sendmsg() and tcp_v4_connect() are called from >