On 15.2.2021 14.51, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 03:43:39PM +0200, Topi Miettinen wrote:
On 13.2.2021 13.55, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
Hello,
Is there a chance of getting this reviewed and maybe even merged, please?
-Topi
I can review it and help with it. But before that i
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 03:43:39PM +0200, Topi Miettinen wrote:
> On 13.2.2021 13.55, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Is there a chance of getting this reviewed and maybe even merged, please?
> > >
> > > -Topi
> > >
> > I can review it and help with it. But before that i would l
On 13.2.2021 13.55, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
Hello,
Is there a chance of getting this reviewed and maybe even merged, please?
-Topi
I can review it and help with it. But before that i would like to
clarify if such "randomization" is something that you can not leave?
This happens to interest
> Hello,
>
> Is there a chance of getting this reviewed and maybe even merged, please?
>
> -Topi
>
I can review it and help with it. But before that i would like to
clarify if such "randomization" is something that you can not leave?
For example on 32bit system vmalloc space is limited, such ra
Hello,
Is there a chance of getting this reviewed and maybe even merged, please?
-Topi
On 12.12.2020 19.56, Topi Miettinen wrote:
Memory mappings inside kernel allocated with vmalloc() are in
predictable order and packed tightly toward the low addresses. With
new kernel boot parameter 'randomi
5 matches
Mail list logo