Em Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 03:50:15PM +0100, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu:
> On 01/15/2018 03:16 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:57:52AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> >>> [root@f27 perf]# ./perf trace --no-syscalls --max-stack 4
> >>> -e probe_l
On 01/15/2018 03:16 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:57:52AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>>> [root@f27 perf]# ./perf trace --no-syscalls --max-stack 4
>>> -e probe_libc:inet_pton/call-graph=dwarf/ ping -6 -c 1 ::1
>>> PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:57:52AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:31:00PM +0100, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu:
> > On 01/12/2018 09:02 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:47:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > > escreveu:
>
Em Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:57:52AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > [root@f27 perf]# ./perf trace --no-syscalls --max-stack 4
> > -e probe_libc:inet_pton/call-graph=dwarf/ ping -6 -c 1 ::1
> > PING ::1(::1) 56 data bytes
> > 64 bytes from ::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms
>
Em Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:31:00PM +0100, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu:
> On 01/12/2018 09:02 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:47:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> >> There is still room for improvement, I noticed overriding is not working
> >> for t
Em Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:11:02AM +0100, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu:
> On 01/12/2018 09:02 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:47:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> >> There is still room for improvement, I noticed overriding is not working
> >> for t
On 01/12/2018 09:02 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:47:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> There is still room for improvement, I noticed overriding is not working
>> for the probe event, investigating it now.
>
> So, I had to fix this another way to
On 01/12/2018 09:02 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:47:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> There is still room for improvement, I noticed overriding is not working
>> for the probe event, investigating it now.
>
> So, I had to fix this another way to
Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:47:06PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> There is still room for improvement, I noticed overriding is not working
> for the probe event, investigating it now.
So, I had to fix this another way to get the possibility of overwriting
the global options (--max-sta
Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:01:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:20:32AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:03:55AM +0100, Thomas Richter escreveu:
> > > On Intel platform when I execute test case
> > >probe libc's i
Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:20:32AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:03:55AM +0100, Thomas Richter escreveu:
> > On Intel platform when I execute test case
> >probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping
> > I get this output which is correct:
> > [root@
Em Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:03:55AM +0100, Thomas Richter escreveu:
> On Intel platform when I execute test case
>probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping
> I get this output which is correct:
>
> [root@f27 perf]# ./perf trace --no-syscalls
> -e probe_libc:inet_pton/max-sta
12 matches
Mail list logo
