Re: [PATCH v2] recordmcount: support >64k sections

2020-06-16 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:38:44PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:03:18 -0700 > Kees Cook wrote: > > > > Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley > > > > Hi! > > > > Can this patch please be applied and sent before -rc2? FGKASLR, LTO, and > > link time improvements[1] all depend on t

Re: [PATCH v2] recordmcount: support >64k sections

2020-06-16 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:03:18 -0700 Kees Cook wrote: > > Reviewed-by: Matt Helsley > > Hi! > > Can this patch please be applied and sent before -rc2? FGKASLR, LTO, and > link time improvements[1] all depend on this fix, and I'd really like > them all to be able to sanely rebase for the develo

Re: [PATCH v2] recordmcount: support >64k sections

2020-06-16 Thread Kees Cook
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 03:22:14PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:30:46PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > When compiling a kernel with Clang and LTO, we need to run > > recordmcount on vmlinux.o with a large number of sections, which > > currently fails as the program doesn