On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 02:33:27PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> Yikes, sorry about that. I've squashed the fixup and sent the updated
> patch (with trimmed cc list): https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/4/16/1125
For future reference, please use: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/MSGID
Then I can search for MSGID in m
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:05 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 03:44:12PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> > Peter,
> >
> > Since you've already pulled the need_resched warning patch into your
> > tree, I'm including just the diff based on that patch (in response to
> > Mel's comments)
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 03:44:12PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Since you've already pulled the need_resched warning patch into your
> tree, I'm including just the diff based on that patch (in response to
> Mel's comments) below. This should be squashed into the original
> patch.
>
Sorry,
Peter,
Since you've already pulled the need_resched warning patch into your
tree, I'm including just the diff based on that patch (in response to
Mel's comments) below. This should be squashed into the original
patch.
Thanks,
Josh
---
>From 85796b4d299b1cf3f99bde154a356ce1061221b7 Mon Sep 17 00:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 02:58:52PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 01:39:16PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > I'm not going to NAK because I do not have hard data that shows they must
> > exist. However, I won't ACK either because I bet a lot of tasty beverages
> > the next time we
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 01:39:16PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> I'm not going to NAK because I do not have hard data that shows they must
> exist. However, I won't ACK either because I bet a lot of tasty beverages
> the next time we meet that the following parameters will generate reports
> if remo
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 4:27 AM Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> I'm not a fan of the name. I know other sysctls have _enabled in the
> name but it's redundant. If you say the name out loud, it sounds weird.
> I would suggest an alternative but see below.
Now using the version rebased by Peter; this control
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 03:36:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 01:39:16PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > > Yeah, lets say I was pleasantly surprised to find it there :-)
> > >
> >
> > Minimally, lets move that out before it gets kicked out. Patch below.
>
> OK, stuck
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 01:39:16PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Yeah, lets say I was pleasantly surprised to find it there :-)
> >
>
> Minimally, lets move that out before it gets kicked out. Patch below.
OK, stuck that in front.
> > > Moving something like sched_min_granularity_ns will break
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 01:12:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:42:24AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:54:24AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:37:43AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > Should we perhaps take out
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:42:24AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:54:24AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:37:43AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Should we perhaps take out all SCHED_DEBUG sysctls and move them to
> > > /debug/sched/ ? (along wi
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:54:24AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:37:43AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Should we perhaps take out all SCHED_DEBUG sysctls and move them to
> > /debug/sched/ ? (along with the existing
> > /debug/sched_{debug,features,preemp}
> > files)
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:57:06PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> From: Paul Turner
>
> CPU scheduler marks need_resched flag to signal a schedule() on a
> particular CPU. But, schedule() may not happen immediately in cases
> where the current task is executing in the kernel mode (no
> preemption state
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:54:24AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:37:43AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Should we perhaps take out all SCHED_DEBUG sysctls and move them to
> > /debug/sched/ ? (along with the existing
> > /debug/sched_{debug,features,preemp}
> > files)
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:37:43AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Should we perhaps take out all SCHED_DEBUG sysctls and move them to
> /debug/sched/ ? (along with the existing /debug/sched_{debug,features,preemp}
> files)
>
> Having all that in sysctl and documented gives them far too much sheen
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:57:06PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> From: Paul Turner
>
> CPU scheduler marks need_resched flag to signal a schedule() on a
> particular CPU. But, schedule() may not happen immediately in cases
> where the current task is executing in the kernel mode (no
> preemption state
16 matches
Mail list logo
