On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 19:23 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:08:58AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > I applied this patch, will include it to the next PR.
> >
>
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:08:58AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook
>
> Thank you.
>
> I applied this patch, will include it to the next PR.
>
Awesome. :)
Thanks, Jarkko.
--
Gustavo
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 22:24 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 11:38:26AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> > variable-length types such as
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 11:38 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:24:10PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 11:38:26AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> > variable-length types
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 11:38:26AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced i
6 matches
Mail list logo