Re: [PATCH v2] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-08 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 02:26:42PM +, alexander.stef...@infineon.com wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:19:28PM +, > > alexander.stef...@infineon.com wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:42:33PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 07:36:42PM +0200, Alexan

RE: [PATCH v2] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-08 Thread Alexander.Steffen
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:19:28PM +, > alexander.stef...@infineon.com wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:42:33PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 07:36:42PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > > > > > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indi

Re: [PATCH v2] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-07 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:19:28PM +, alexander.stef...@infineon.com wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:42:33PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 07:36:42PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > > > > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the >

RE: [PATCH v2] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-06 Thread Alexander.Steffen
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:42:33PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 07:36:42PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > > > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the > > > number of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it > > > relies on th

Re: [PATCH v2] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-06 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:42:33PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 07:36:42PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number > > of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the > > commandS

Re: [PATCH v2] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-06 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 07:36:42PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number > of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the > commandSize field in the TPM header that is encoded within the buffer. > Therefor

Re: [PATCH v2] tpm-dev-common: Reject too short writes

2017-09-05 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 07:36:42PM +0200, Alexander Steffen wrote: > tpm_transmit() does not offer an explicit interface to indicate the number > of valid bytes in the communication buffer. Instead, it relies on the > commandSize field in the TPM header that is encoded within the buffer. > Therefor