On Fri 2014-11-14 08:19:15, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Michael, Petr.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:32:04PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > + /* The workqueue servicing the balloon. */
> > > + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> > > + struct work_struct wq_work;
> >
> > We could use system_free
Hello, Michael, Petr.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:32:04PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > + /* The workqueue servicing the balloon. */
> > + struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> > + struct work_struct wq_work;
>
> We could use system_freezable_wq instead.
> I do agree a dedicated wq is better
Trivial typo "vballon" should be "vballoon" in subject (and in changelog,
leak_ballon should be leak_balloon)
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordo
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:02:48PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Workqueues have clean and rich API for all basic operations. The code is
> usually
> easier and better readable. It can be easily tuned for the given purpose.
>
> In many cases, it allows to avoid an extra kernel thread. It helps to s
4 matches
Mail list logo
