Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] device: property: delay device-driver matches

2015-07-16 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:41:16AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > I have to say I'm still not 100% clear that special casing platform > > devices makes sense here - I can s

Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] device: property: delay device-driver matches

2015-07-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Mark, On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> Delay matches of platform devices until late_initcall, when we are sure >> that all built-in drivers have been registered already. This is needed >> to prevent deferre

Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] device: property: delay device-driver matches

2015-07-16 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Delay matches of platform devices until late_initcall, when we are sure > that all built-in drivers have been registered already. This is needed > to prevent deferred probes because of some dependencies' drivers not > having registere

Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] device: property: delay device-driver matches

2015-07-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 2 July 2015 at 01:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:40:56 AM Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Delay matches of platform devices until late_initcall, when we are sure >> that all built-in drivers have been registered already. This is needed >> to prevent deferred probes because

Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] device: property: delay device-driver matches

2015-07-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:40:56 AM Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Delay matches of platform devices until late_initcall, when we are sure > that all built-in drivers have been registered already. This is needed > to prevent deferred probes because of some dependencies' drivers not > having registered y