On 09.08.16 14:29, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 08/06/2016 01:48 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
No need to check number of handled packets, when in most cases (> 99%)
it's not 0. It can be 0 only in rare cases, even in this case
it's not bad to print just 0.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk
---
dr
On 08/06/2016 01:48 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> No need to check number of handled packets, when in most cases (> 99%)
> it's not 0. It can be 0 only in rare cases, even in this case
> it's not bad to print just 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 8 ++
On Saturday 06 August 2016 04:18 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> No need to check number of handled packets, when in most cases (> 99%)
> it's not 0. It can be 0 only in rare cases, even in this case
> it's not bad to print just 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk
Reviewed-by: Mugunthan V N
Reg
3 matches
Mail list logo