Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] backports: use BACKPORT_DIR prefix on kconfig sources

2014-11-05 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 10:19:14PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 21:11 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > This does mean that bp_prefix topic *can* also be tied down > > with this other directory prefix as a form of 'builder' for > > integration. Making the prefix configur

Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] backports: use BACKPORT_DIR prefix on kconfig sources

2014-11-05 Thread Johannes Berg
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 21:11 +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > This does mean that bp_prefix topic *can* also be tied down > with this other directory prefix as a form of 'builder' for > integration. Making the prefix configurable would make sense > then only if also making the directory prefix sho

Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] backports: use BACKPORT_DIR prefix on kconfig sources

2014-11-05 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 08:51:45AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 19:18 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > @@ -21,23 +22,53 @@ class ConfigTree(object): > > yield f > > for l in open(os.path.join(self.basedir, f), 'r'): > > m = src_line.match(

Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] backports: use BACKPORT_DIR prefix on kconfig sources

2014-11-04 Thread Johannes Berg
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 19:18 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > @@ -21,23 +22,53 @@ class ConfigTree(object): > yield f > for l in open(os.path.join(self.basedir, f), 'r'): > m = src_line.match(l) > -if m and os.path.exists(os.path.join(self.basedir, > m.g