On 13/04/2021 10:12, liuqi (BA) wrote:
I do wonder why we even need maintain pcie_pmu->cpumask
Can't we just use cpu_online_mask as appropiate instead?
?
Sorry, missed it yesterday.
It seems that cpumask is always same as cpu_online_mask, So do we need
to reserve the cpumask sysfs interface
Hi John,
On 2021/4/13 1:21, John Garry wrote:
On 12/04/2021 14:34, liuqi (BA) wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks for reviewing this.
On 2021/4/9 18:22, John Garry wrote:
On 09/04/2021 10:05, Qi Liu wrote:
PCIe PMU Root Complex Integrated End Point(RCiEP) device is supported
to sample bandwidth, laten
On 12/04/2021 14:34, liuqi (BA) wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks for reviewing this.
On 2021/4/9 18:22, John Garry wrote:
On 09/04/2021 10:05, Qi Liu wrote:
PCIe PMU Root Complex Integrated End Point(RCiEP) device is supported
to sample bandwidth, latency, buffer occupation etc.
Each PMU RCiEP device
Hi John,
Thanks for reviewing this.
On 2021/4/9 18:22, John Garry wrote:
On 09/04/2021 10:05, Qi Liu wrote:
PCIe PMU Root Complex Integrated End Point(RCiEP) device is supported
to sample bandwidth, latency, buffer occupation etc.
Each PMU RCiEP device monitors multiple Root Ports, and each
On 09/04/2021 10:05, Qi Liu wrote:
PCIe PMU Root Complex Integrated End Point(RCiEP) device is supported
to sample bandwidth, latency, buffer occupation etc.
Each PMU RCiEP device monitors multiple Root Ports, and each RCiEP is
registered as a PMU in /sys/bus/event_source/devices, so users can
s
5 matches
Mail list logo
