Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/cpufreq: always consider blocked FAIR utilization

2018-05-14 Thread Vincent Guittot
On 14 May 2018 at 18:48, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > On 14-May 11:16, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> Hi Patrick, > > Hi Vincent, > >> On 11 May 2018 at 15:15, Patrick Bellasi wrote: >> > Since the refactoring introduced by: >> > >> >commit 8f111bc357aa ("cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support"

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/cpufreq: always consider blocked FAIR utilization

2018-05-14 Thread Patrick Bellasi
On 14-May 11:16, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Hi Patrick, Hi Vincent, > On 11 May 2018 at 15:15, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > Since the refactoring introduced by: > > > >commit 8f111bc357aa ("cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support") > > > > we aggregate FAIR utilization only if this class

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/cpufreq: always consider blocked FAIR utilization

2018-05-14 Thread Vincent Guittot
Hi Patrick, On 11 May 2018 at 15:15, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > Since the refactoring introduced by: > >commit 8f111bc357aa ("cpufreq/schedutil: Rewrite CPUFREQ_RT support") > > we aggregate FAIR utilization only if this class has runnable tasks. > This was mainly due to avoid the risk to stay