On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:42:14AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 10:28 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >If you want an incremental patch against original patchset,
> >I can do it. Please let me know what you want.
>
> Yes, please. Incremental is much easier to deal with if we want this
> to
On 10/30/2013 10:28 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
If you want an incremental patch against original patchset,
I can do it. Please let me know what you want.
Yes, please. Incremental is much easier to deal with if we want this to
end up in v3.13.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this
Hello, Pekka.
There are two problems with this patch.
One is that this makes kmemleak warning WHEN CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK,
because of false kmemleak_scan_area() call.
Another is about non-existing 'struct freelist'. It is not really
matter, since I just use a pointer to struct freelist. Therefore
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> I search the history of struct page and find that the SLUB use mapping field
> in past (2007 year). At that time, you inserted VM_BUG_ON(PageSlab(page))
> ('b5fab14') into page_mapping() function to find remaining use. Recently,
> I never hear that this is
2013/10/18 Christoph Lameter :
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
>> - * see PAGE_MAPPING_ANON below.
>> - */
>> + union {
>> + struct address_space *mapping; /* If low bit clear, points to
>> +
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> - * see PAGE_MAPPING_ANON below.
> - */
> + union {
> + struct address_space *mapping; /* If low bit clear, points to
> +
6 matches
Mail list logo
