On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 08:21 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:13:07PM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 14:42 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >
> > > I do have a question of what kind of tearing you are talking about. Do
> > > you mean the tearing due to mm b
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:13:07PM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 14:42 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>
> > I do have a question of what kind of tearing you are talking about. Do
> > you mean the tearing due to mm being changed in the middle of the
> > access? The reason why I don't
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 11:54 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> I also wonder why this patch is included in a set called
> "sched, timer: Improve scalability of itimers" ;)
Good point :)
The reason these first 2 patches were included in this patchset is
because patch 3 depended on patch 1 (particul
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 14:42 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> I do have a question of what kind of tearing you are talking about. Do
> you mean the tearing due to mm being changed in the middle of the
> access? The reason why I don't like this kind of construct is that I am
> not sure if
> the addres
On 04/30/2015 02:54 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 14:42 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
On 04/29/2015 02:45 PM, Jason Low wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:14 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
On 04/28/2015 04:00 PM, Jason Low wrote:
The p->mm->numa_scan_seq is accessed using READ_ONCE/WRI
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 14:42 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 02:45 PM, Jason Low wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:14 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >> On 04/28/2015 04:00 PM, Jason Low wrote:
> >>> The p->mm->numa_scan_seq is accessed using READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE
> >>> and modified without e
On 04/29/2015 02:45 PM, Jason Low wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:14 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
On 04/28/2015 04:00 PM, Jason Low wrote:
The p->mm->numa_scan_seq is accessed using READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE
and modified without exclusive access. It is not clear why it is
accessed this way. This patch
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:14 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 04/28/2015 04:00 PM, Jason Low wrote:
> > The p->mm->numa_scan_seq is accessed using READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE
> > and modified without exclusive access. It is not clear why it is
> > accessed this way. This patch provides some documentation on
On 04/28/2015 04:00 PM, Jason Low wrote:
The p->mm->numa_scan_seq is accessed using READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE
and modified without exclusive access. It is not clear why it is
accessed this way. This patch provides some documentation on that.
Signed-off-by: Jason Low
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 +
On 04/28/2015 04:00 PM, Jason Low wrote:
The p->mm->numa_scan_seq is accessed using READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE
and modified without exclusive access. It is not clear why it is
accessed this way. This patch provides some documentation on that.
Signed-off-by: Jason Low
Acked-by: Rik van Riel
--
To
10 matches
Mail list logo
