On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 08:44:43PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
> > All the patches look good to me. I can't say I'm a big fan of
> > function defining macros but I don't have prettier alternatives
> > either. Once Peter/Ingo acks the patches, I'll route them through
> > cgroup/f
Zefan Li wrote:
> Those macros make the code easier to read, and emacs and cscope can also
> understand them.
I'm using legacy LXR which cannot understand them. But
> I'd vote for this:
>
> TASK_PFA_TEST(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
> TASK_PFA_SET(NO_NEW_PRIVS, no_new_privs)
>
> TASK_PFA_TEST(SP
2 matches
Mail list logo