On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:14 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 04:42:58PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers via gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Just to prove my point about version checks being brittle, it looks
> > like Rasmus' version check isn't even right. GCC supported `asm
> > inline`
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:03 PM Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 11:14:08AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Here's the case that I think is perfect:
> > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/02/25/new-asm-flags-feature-for-x86-in-gcc-6/
> >
> > Specifically the feature tes
On 05/09/2019 15.45, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:07:11PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On 05/09/2019 02.18, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>> Is it too late to ask for a feature test macro? Maybe one already
>>> exists?
>>
>> No, not as far as I know.
>
>
Hi Rasmus,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:07:11PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 05/09/2019 02.18, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Is it too late to ask for a feature test macro? Maybe one already
> > exists?
>
> No, not as far as I know.
[ That's not what a feature test macro is; a feature test m
> On Sep 4, 2019, at 5:18 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:15 PM Rasmus Villemoes
> wrote:
>> This adds an asm_inline macro which expands to "asm inline" [1] when gcc
>> is new enough (>= 9.1), and just asm for older gccs and other
>> compilers.
>>
>> Using asm inline("
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:15 PM Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> This adds an asm_inline macro which expands to "asm inline" [1] when gcc
> is new enough (>= 9.1), and just asm for older gccs and other
> compilers.
>
> Using asm inline("foo") instead of asm("foo") overrules gcc's
> heuristic estimate o
6 matches
Mail list logo
