Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] selftest/x86: build both bitnesses

2015-04-17 Thread Tyler Baker
On 17 April 2015 at 15:27, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Tyler Baker wrote: >> On 17 April 2015 at 15:06, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Tyler Baker wrote: Using uname with the processor flag option in some cases can yield 'unk

Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] selftest/x86: build both bitnesses

2015-04-17 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Tyler Baker wrote: > On 17 April 2015 at 15:06, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Tyler Baker wrote: >>> Using uname with the processor flag option in some cases can yield 'unknown' >>> so lets use the machine flag option as it is determi

Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] selftest/x86: build both bitnesses

2015-04-17 Thread Tyler Baker
On 17 April 2015 at 15:06, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Tyler Baker wrote: >> Using uname with the processor flag option in some cases can yield 'unknown' >> so lets use the machine flag option as it is deterministic. Add a dependency >> for all_32 when building on a

Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] selftest/x86: build both bitnesses

2015-04-17 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Tyler Baker wrote: > Using uname with the processor flag option in some cases can yield 'unknown' > so lets use the machine flag option as it is deterministic. Add a dependency > for all_32 when building on a x86 64 bit host so that both bitnesses are > built in th