On 2017/10/25 13:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/24, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/10/24 20:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 10/24, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2017/10/4 9:08, Chao Yu wrote:
> From: Chao Yu
>
> In ->umount, once we drop remained discard entries, we should not
On 10/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/10/24 20:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 10/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> On 2017/10/4 9:08, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> From: Chao Yu
> >>>
> >>> In ->umount, once we drop remained discard entries, we should not
> >>> set CP_TRIMMED_FLAG with another chec
On 2017/10/24 20:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/24, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2017/10/4 9:08, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> From: Chao Yu
>>>
>>> In ->umount, once we drop remained discard entries, we should not
>>> set CP_TRIMMED_FLAG with another checkpoint.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
>>>
On 10/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> On 2017/10/4 9:08, Chao Yu wrote:
> > From: Chao Yu
> >
> > In ->umount, once we drop remained discard entries, we should not
> > set CP_TRIMMED_FLAG with another checkpoint.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - rebase on last codes of
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2017/10/4 9:08, Chao Yu wrote:
> From: Chao Yu
>
> In ->umount, once we drop remained discard entries, we should not
> set CP_TRIMMED_FLAG with another checkpoint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
> ---
> v2:
> - rebase on last codes of Jaegeuk's dev-test branch.
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
5 matches
Mail list logo