Re: [PATCH v3] Provide USF for the portable equipment.

2020-08-05 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:17:28AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Sending updated patchset for this isn't going to help you my friend. You need > people (maintainers) to agree on the idea here first. It doesn't take much work to make the code look nice. Writing pretty code is always a good idea bec

Re: [PATCH v3] Provide USF for the portable equipment.

2020-08-04 Thread Greg KH
A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? A: No. Q: Should I includ

Re: [PATCH v3] Provide USF for the portable equipment.

2020-08-03 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 03-08-20, 22:31, Dongdong Yang wrote: > From: Dongdong Yang > > This patch provides USF(User Sensitive Feedback factor) auxiliary > cpufreq governor to support high level layer sysfs inodes setting > for utils adjustment purpose from the identified scenario on portable > equipment. Because the