On 17/06/2020 20:57, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:36 AM Steven Price wrote:
On 17/06/2020 15:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 8:36 AM Steven Price wrote:
>
> On 17/06/2020 15:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> >> Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> T
On 17/06/2020 15:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get
resources)
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get
> > resources) as an error. Also there is no need to
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get
> resources) as an error. Also there is no need to print regulator errors
> twice.
>
> In case of multiple probe tries this wo
5 matches
Mail list logo