Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe

2025-05-19 Thread Dylan Hatch
> FWIW: I reviewed the patch above ([1]) already but didn't hear anything > back. Sorry for the delay on this, last week was busier than expected on my end. I'm aiming to send the revised patch within the next couple of days. On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:40 AM Mark Rutland wrote: > I've had a quick

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe

2025-05-19 Thread Mark Rutland
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 09:53:36AM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > ARM folks, please share your thoughts on this work. To fully support > livepatching of kernel modules, we also need [1]. We hope we can > land this in the 6.16 kernel. > > Thanks, > Song > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kerne

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe

2025-05-19 Thread Will Deacon
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 09:53:36AM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 8:17 AM Petr Mladek wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250127213310.2496133-1-wn...@google.com/ > > > [2] > > > https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250129232936.1

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe

2025-05-19 Thread Mark Rutland
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 09:53:36AM -0700, Song Liu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 8:17 AM Petr Mladek wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250127213310.2496133-1-wn...@google.com/ > > > [2] > > > https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250129232936.1

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe

2025-05-16 Thread Song Liu
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 8:17 AM Petr Mladek wrote: > [...] > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250127213310.2496133-1-wn...@google.com/ > > [2] > > https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250129232936.1795412-1-s...@kernel.org/ > > [3] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe

2025-04-10 Thread Petr Mladek
On Thu 2025-03-20 10:15:57, Song Liu wrote: > There are recent efforts to enable livepatch for arm64, with sframe [1] or > without sframe [2]. This set tries to enable livepatch without sframe. Some > of the code, however, are from [1]. > > Although the sframe implementation is more promising in l

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe

2025-03-27 Thread Petr Mladek
On Thu 2025-03-20 10:15:57, Song Liu wrote: > There are recent efforts to enable livepatch for arm64, with sframe [1] or > without sframe [2]. This set tries to enable livepatch without sframe. Some > of the code, however, are from [1]. > > Although the sframe implementation is more promising in l

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe

2025-03-25 Thread Song Liu
Hi Petr, > On Mar 25, 2025, at 8:53 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: [...] >> >> Given the increasing need of livepatching, and relatively long time before >> sframe is fully ready (for both gcc and clang), we would like to enable >> livepatch without sframe. >> >> Thanks! >> >> [1] >> https://lore.k