Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] printk: replace ringbuffer

Hi Dave, On 2020-06-25, Dave Young wrote: > On 06/18/20 at 04:55pm, John Ogness wrote: >> Here is a v3 for the first series to rework the printk >> subsystem. The v2 and history are here [0]. This first series >> only replaces the existing ringbuffer implementation. No locking >> is removed. No s

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] printk: replace ringbuffer

Hi John, On 06/18/20 at 04:55pm, John Ogness wrote: > Hello, > > Here is a v3 for the first series to rework the printk > subsystem. The v2 and history are here [0]. This first series > only replaces the existing ringbuffer implementation. No locking > is removed. No semantics/behavior of printk a