Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-31 Thread Minchan Kim
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:19:00AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:02:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > Greg, what do you thi

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-31 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:02:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > Greg, what do you think about LTSI? > > > Is it proper feature to add it? For it, still do I need

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-30 Thread Minchan Kim
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Greg, what do you think about LTSI? > > Is it proper feature to add it? For it, still do I need ACK from mm > > developers? > > It's already in LTSI, as it's in t

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-30 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Greg, what do you think about LTSI? > Is it proper feature to add it? For it, still do I need ACK from mm > developers? It's already in LTSI, as it's in the 3.4 kernel, right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-30 Thread Minchan Kim
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:16:18PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:04:43AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:42:09PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > Tha

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-30 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:04:43AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:42:09PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > Thanks all, > > > > > > At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-30 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 06:42:09PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Thanks all, > > > > At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under /lib. > > > > Greg, > > What should I do for promoting this drag

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-30 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:06:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Thanks all, > > At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under /lib. > > Greg, > What should I do for promoting this dragging patchset? You need to get the -mm developers to agree that this is something that is w

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-30 Thread Minchan Kim
Thanks all, At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under /lib. Greg, What should I do for promoting this dragging patchset? On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:56:46PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging. > Both are very clean and zram have

Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-29 Thread Seth Jennings
On 10/29/2012 03:56 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging. > Both are very clean and zram have been used by many embedded product > for a long time. > It's time to go out of staging. Agreed! > Greg, Jens is already OK that zram is located under driver/blocks/.

RE: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion

2012-10-29 Thread Dan Magenheimer
> From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minc...@kernel.org] > Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion > > The candidate is two under mm/ or under lib/ > Konrad and Nitin wanted to put zsmalloc into lib/ instead of mm/. > > Quote from Nitin > " > I think mm/ directory should only contain the code whic