Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-31 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO
On 3/30/2016 6:44 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: Hello Tomeu On 3/15/2016 8:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Thanks. Btw, I have rebased on top of 4.5 this morning and I have noticed that 88f8b1bb41c6 ("stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-30 Thread Dinh Nguyen
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > Hello Tomeu > > On 3/15/2016 8:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> Thanks. >> >> Btw, I have rebased on top of 4.5 this morning and I have noticed that >> 88f8b1bb41c6 ("stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression") got in >> there, so I gu

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-15 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO
Hello Tomeu On 3/15/2016 8:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Thanks. Btw, I have rebased on top of 4.5 this morning and I have noticed that 88f8b1bb41c6 ("stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression") got in there, so I guess we have now a bunch of boards with broken network on that release:( This

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 14 March 2016 at 17:20, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > Hi Tomeu > > On 3/14/2016 12:43 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> Hi Peppe, >> >> with that patch I don't see any difference at all in my setup. >> >> So to be clear, with these commits on top of next-20160314, I still >> get the hang during boot:

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-14 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO
Hi Tomeu On 3/14/2016 12:43 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Hi Peppe, with that patch I don't see any difference at all in my setup. So to be clear, with these commits on top of next-20160314, I still get the hang during boot: 209afef6f0cd ARM: dts: rockchip: Add mdio node to ethernet node 2315acc6cf

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 11 March 2016 at 10:09, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > On 3/10/2016 5:47 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO >> wrote: >>> >>> On 3/9/2016 5:31 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-11 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO
On 3/10/2016 5:47 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: On 3/9/2016 5:31 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the tx timeout. The

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-10 Thread Dinh Nguyen
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > On 3/9/2016 5:31 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas >>> >>> I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the >>> tx timeout. >>> >>> The "stmmac: MD

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-10 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO
On 3/9/2016 5:31 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the tx timeout. The "stmmac: MDIO fixes" seems to be the candidate to fix the phy connection and I will send the V2 asap (And

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-09 Thread Dinh Nguyen
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas > > I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the > tx timeout. > > The "stmmac: MDIO fixes" seems to be the candidate to > fix the phy connection and I will send the V2 asap (Andreas' comment). > > So, supposi

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-09 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO
Hi Tomeu, Dinh, Andreas I need a sum and help from you to go ahead on the tx timeout. The "stmmac: MDIO fixes" seems to be the candidate to fix the phy connection and I will send the V2 asap (Andreas' comment). So, supposing the probe is ok and phy is connected, I need your input ... Tomeu: a

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-09 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO
Hi Tomeu On 3/9/2016 11:53 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On 9 March 2016 at 11:27, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: Hello Tomeu, Andreas, On 3/9/2016 10:52 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: * today's linux-next: probe failed * today's linux-next + revert of 88f8b1bb41c6 stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' reg

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 9 March 2016 at 11:27, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > Hello Tomeu, Andreas, > > On 3/9/2016 10:52 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: >>> >>> * today's linux-next: probe failed >>> >>> * today's linux-next + revert of 88f8b1bb41c6 stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No >>> PHY found' regression: probe succeeded but no n

Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

2016-03-09 Thread Giuseppe CAVALLARO
Hello Tomeu, Andreas, On 3/9/2016 10:52 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: * today's linux-next: probe failed * today's linux-next + revert of 88f8b1bb41c6 stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression: probe succeeded but no network at all * today's linux-next + revert of 88f8b1bb41c6 (stmmac: Fix '