Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-10-05 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:50:49AM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote: > On 25/09/2017 18:27, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Laurent Dufour > > wrote: > >> Despite the unprovable lockdep warning raised by Sergey, I didn't get any > >> feedback on this series. > >> > >> Is

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-10-03 Thread Laurent Dufour
On 25/09/2017 18:27, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Laurent Dufour > wrote: >> Despite the unprovable lockdep warning raised by Sergey, I didn't get any >> feedback on this series. >> >> Is there a chance to get it moved upstream ? > > what is the status ? > We're e

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-10-03 Thread Laurent Dufour
On 03/10/2017 03:27, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Laurent Dufour writes: > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> On 28/09/2017 22:38, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:29:02 +0200 Laurent Dufour >>> wrote: >>> > Laurent's [0/n] provides some nice-looking performance benefits for > workloads wh

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-10-02 Thread Michael Ellerman
Laurent Dufour writes: > Hi Andrew, > > On 28/09/2017 22:38, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:29:02 +0200 Laurent Dufour >> wrote: >> Laurent's [0/n] provides some nice-looking performance benefits for workloads which are chosen to show performance benefits(!) but, alas

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-09-29 Thread Laurent Dufour
Hi Andrew, On 28/09/2017 22:38, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:29:02 +0200 Laurent Dufour wrote: Laurent's [0/n] provides some nice-looking performance benefits for workloads which are chosen to show performance benefits(!) but, alas, no quantitative testing results for workload

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-09-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:29:02 +0200 Laurent Dufour wrote: > > Laurent's [0/n] provides some nice-looking performance benefits for > > workloads which are chosen to show performance benefits(!) but, alas, > > no quantitative testing results for workloads which we may suspect will > > be harmed by

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-09-28 Thread Laurent Dufour
Hi Andrew, On 26/09/2017 01:34, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:27:43 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote: Despite the unprovable lockdep warning raised by Sergey, I didn't get any feedback on this series. Is there a chance to

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-09-28 Thread Laurent Dufour
Hi, On 26/09/2017 01:34, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:27:43 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote: Despite the unprovable lockdep warning raised by Sergey, I didn't get any feedback on this series. Is there a chance to get it

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-09-26 Thread Laurent Dufour
Hi Alexei, Le 25/09/2017 à 18:27, Alexei Starovoitov a écrit : On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote: Despite the unprovable lockdep warning raised by Sergey, I didn't get any feedback on this series. Is there a chance to get it moved upstream ? what is the status ? As me

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-09-25 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:27:43 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Laurent Dufour > wrote: > > Despite the unprovable lockdep warning raised by Sergey, I didn't get any > > feedback on this series. > > > > Is there a chance to get it moved upstream ? > > what is t

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-09-25 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote: > Despite the unprovable lockdep warning raised by Sergey, I didn't get any > feedback on this series. > > Is there a chance to get it moved upstream ? what is the status ? We're eagerly looking forward for this set to land, since we have se

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-09-18 Thread Laurent Dufour
Despite the unprovable lockdep warning raised by Sergey, I didn't get any feedback on this series. Is there a chance to get it moved upstream ? Thanks, Laurent. On 08/09/2017 20:06, Laurent Dufour wrote: > This is a port on kernel 4.13 of the work done by Peter Zijlstra to > handle page fault wi

Re: [PATCH v3 00/20] Speculative page faults

2017-09-08 Thread Laurent Dufour
On 08/09/2017 19:32, Laurent Dufour wrote: > This is a port on kernel 4.13 of the work done by Peter Zijlstra to > handle page fault without holding the mm semaphore [1]. Sorry for the noise, I got trouble sending the whole series through this email. I will try again. Cheers, Laurent.