I actually found someone locally who signed my key.
Good luck!
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 07:24:34PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 January 2013 02:14 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Vineet,
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:40:24 +0530 Vineet Gupta
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Stephen,
On Wednesday 30 January 2013 02:14 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:40:24 +0530 Vineet Gupta
> wrote:
>>
>> Stephen, can you please add the following branch (rebased off 3.8-rc5) to
>> linux-next
>>
>> git://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/linu
Hi Vineet,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:44:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:40:24 +0530 Vineet Gupta
> wrote:
> >
> > Stephen, can you please add the following branch (rebased off 3.8-rc5) to
> > linux-next
> >
> > git://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/li
Hi Vineet,
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:40:24 +0530 Vineet Gupta
wrote:
>
> Stephen, can you please add the following branch (rebased off 3.8-rc5) to
> linux-next
>
> git://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/linux.git arc-next
Added from today (though there may not be a linux-next rel
Hi Stephen,
On Monday 28 January 2013 12:40 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi Arnd / Stephen,
>
> On Saturday 26 January 2013 05:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I'd suggest that you both ask Stephen to add the trees to linux-next
>> now (I thought you had done that already, but I don't see them there
Hi Vineet
On 28/01/13 07:10, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> You don't need Acked-by statements on every single patch, but having
>> more of those is certainly benefitial. When it comes to the merge
>> window, please send a pull request to Linus, and keep me on Cc,
>> so I can weigh in with an additional A
Hi Arnd / Stephen,
On Saturday 26 January 2013 05:55 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2013, James Hogan wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 10/01/13 15:30, James Hogan wrote:
>>> This patchset adds core architecture support to Linux for Imagination's
>>> Meta ATP (Meta 1) and HTP (Meta 2) p
Hi Arnd,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:25:09AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 25 January 2013, James Hogan wrote:
> > Review seems to have gone quiet. I'm fairly happy with this core
> > patchset in it's currently form (only trivial alterations required since
> > the v3 patches, e.g. some re
On Friday 25 January 2013, James Hogan wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 10/01/13 15:30, James Hogan wrote:
> > This patchset adds core architecture support to Linux for Imagination's
> > Meta ATP (Meta 1) and HTP (Meta 2) processor cores. Most of the feedback
> > from the RFC and v2 patchsets has now been
Hi Arnd,
On 10/01/13 15:30, James Hogan wrote:
> This patchset adds core architecture support to Linux for Imagination's
> Meta ATP (Meta 1) and HTP (Meta 2) processor cores. Most of the feedback
> from the RFC and v2 patchsets has now been addressed. All further
> feedback is most welcome.
>
> T
On 19/01/13 05:55, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:55:07AM +, James Hogan wrote:
>> Hi Stephen, Al,
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 + James Hogan
>>> wrote:
Okay, I've rebased the metag tree fro
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 09:55:07AM +, James Hogan wrote:
> Hi Stephen, Al,
>
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 + James Hogan
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch
Hi James,
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 09:55:07 + James Hogan wrote:
>
> Would "sufficiently ready" normally mean "in a state ready to send a
> pull request to Linus"?
That is the usual criteria.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
pgp9Q9GPvSzrc.pgp
Description: P
Hi Stephen, Al,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:09:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 + James Hogan wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch
> > of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and
> > GENER
Hi James,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:02:06 + James Hogan wrote:
>
> Okay, I've rebased the metag tree from linux-next onto the master branch
> of Al's signal tree (to get Vineet's GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK fix and
> GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK's eventual removal).
OK, but I hope you mentioned not rebasing to
Hi,
On 11/01/13 13:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 + James Hogan wrote:
>>
>> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
>>> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (
Hi Stephen,
On 11/01/13 13:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 + James Hogan wrote:
>>
>> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
>>> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus
Hi James,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:16 + James Hogan wrote:
>
> On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
> > can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or some
> > other tree that does not reba
On 10/01/13 23:34, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> You really should not base development work on linux-next and before I
> can include it there you will need to rebase it onto Linus' tree (or some
> other tree that does not rebase). Its OK to test by doing a merge with
> linux-next ...
Thanks for the
Hi James,
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:30:28 + James Hogan wrote:
>
> This patchset adds core architecture support to Linux for Imagination's
> Meta ATP (Meta 1) and HTP (Meta 2) processor cores. Most of the feedback
> from the RFC and v2 patchsets has now been addressed. All further
> feedback is
20 matches
Mail list logo
