Re: [PATCH v3 01/18] clk: ingenic: Use const pointer to clk_ops in struct

2017-07-13 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 07/13, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:07:25PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > > > > Sorry I forgot, did you want an ack for these clk patches or for > > > me to take them through clk tree. If it's the ack case, > > > > > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd > > > > > > for patches 1 thro

Re: [PATCH v3 01/18] clk: ingenic: Use const pointer to clk_ops in struct

2017-07-13 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:07:25PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > > Sorry I forgot, did you want an ack for these clk patches or for > > me to take them through clk tree. If it's the ack case, > > > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd > > > > for patches 1 through 6. > > I think ACK; then Ralf can take th

Re: [PATCH v3 01/18] clk: ingenic: Use const pointer to clk_ops in struct

2017-07-13 Thread Paul Cercueil
Le 2017-07-13 01:20, Stephen Boyd a écrit : On 07/02, Paul Cercueil wrote: The CGU common code does not modify the pointed clk_ops structure, so it should be marked as const. Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil --- Sorry I forgot, did you want an ack for these clk patches or for me to take them th

Re: [PATCH v3 01/18] clk: ingenic: Use const pointer to clk_ops in struct

2017-07-12 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 07/02, Paul Cercueil wrote: > The CGU common code does not modify the pointed clk_ops structure, so it > should be marked as const. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil > --- Sorry I forgot, did you want an ack for these clk patches or for me to take them through clk tree. If it's the ack case,