Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] devicetree: Add generic IOMMU device tree bindings

2014-07-04 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 04 July 2014 06:42:48 Varun Sethi wrote: > Master node corresponds to the device node, right? Master ID would correspond > to Stream ID? We are already using "iommu-parent" property to link a device > to its corresponding IOMMU. We can use the same property instead of using > "iommus".

RE: [PATCH v3 02/10] devicetree: Add generic IOMMU device tree bindings

2014-07-03 Thread Varun Sethi
> -Original Message- > From: iommu-boun...@lists.linux-foundation.org [mailto:iommu- > boun...@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Thierry Reding > Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 2:20 AM > To: Rob Herring; Pawel Moll; Mark Rutland; Ian Campbell; Kumar Gala; > Stephen Warren; Arnd Bergma

Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] devicetree: Add generic IOMMU device tree bindings

2014-06-30 Thread Stephen Warren
On 06/26/2014 02:49 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > From: Thierry Reding > > This commit introduces a generic device tree binding for IOMMU devices. > Only a very minimal subset is described here, but it is enough to cover > the requirements of both the Exynos System MMU and Tegra SMMU as > discussed

Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] devicetree: Add generic IOMMU device tree bindings

2014-06-27 Thread Will Deacon
Hi Thierry, On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:49:42PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > From: Thierry Reding > > This commit introduces a generic device tree binding for IOMMU devices. > Only a very minimal subset is described here, but it is enough to cover > the requirements of both the Exynos System MM