On Thu, 14 Feb 2019, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Ok, this looks reasonable, but will have a minor clash with Gustavo's
> "security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing
> break".
>
> James, are you picking up Gastavo's v2 patch from Friday?
Nope.
>
> Mimi
>
> > ---
> >
> > No change
On Thu, 2019-02-14 at 12:28 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 23:16 +0100, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > Commit a893ea15d764 ("tpm: move tpm_chip definition to
> > include/linux/tpm.h") introduced a build error when both ima and efi is
> > enabled. What happens is that both headers (ima.h
On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 23:16 +0100, Anders Roxell wrote:
> Commit a893ea15d764 ("tpm: move tpm_chip definition to
> include/linux/tpm.h") introduced a build error when both ima and efi is
> enabled. What happens is that both headers (ima.h and efi.h) defines the
> same 'NONE' constant, and it broke
3 matches
Mail list logo
