On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Florian Vaussard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 03/15/2013 07:59 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Florian and Thierry,
>>>
>>> Sorry, guys. My bad! I'm using GMAIL filtering my emails. This email
>>> goes into my arm-linux mail list archive and I totally missed it.
Hi,
On 03/15/2013 07:59 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
Hi Florian and Thierry,
Sorry, guys. My bad! I'm using GMAIL filtering my emails. This email
goes into my arm-linux mail list archive and I totally missed it.
I can merge this patch into my for-next branch, but it will be in 3.10
not 3.9-rcX.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:08:57AM -0700, Bryan Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Florian Vaussard
> wrote:
> > Hi Bryan,
> >
> >
> >
> > Bryan, I assume that you'll be taking this? It doesn't apply cleanly to
> > my tree, probably because of Peter's recent changes that you
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Florian Vaussard
wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
>
>
> Bryan, I assume that you'll be taking this? It doesn't apply cleanly to
> my tree, probably because of Peter's recent changes that you took
> through your tree and Florian based his patches on top of that.
Hi Bryan,
Bryan, I assume that you'll be taking this? It doesn't apply cleanly to
my tree, probably because of Peter's recent changes that you took
through your tree and Florian based his patches on top of that. The
conflict resolution should be trivial, though.
It seems that this patch was
On 03/04/2013 11:58 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:44:22AM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Hi Bryan, Richard,
On 01/30/2013 09:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic c
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:44:22AM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> Hi Bryan, Richard,
>
> >On 01/30/2013 09:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> >>>Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic context, like triggers.
> >>>If the PW
Hi Bryan, Richard,
On 01/30/2013 09:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic context, like triggers.
If the PWM call can sleep, defer using a worker.
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi
Signed-off-by: Florian
Hi Bryan,
On 01/30/2013 09:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic context, like triggers.
If the PWM call can sleep, defer using a worker.
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi
Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard
On 01/30/2013 09:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic context, like triggers.
If the PWM call can sleep, defer using a worker.
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi
Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard
---
driv
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic context, like triggers.
> If the PWM call can sleep, defer using a worker.
>
> Cc: Peter Ujfalusi
> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 50 +
On 01/28/2013 03:00 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic context, like triggers.
> If the PWM call can sleep, defer using a worker.
>
> Cc: Peter Ujfalusi
> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard
Reviewed-by: Peter Ujfalusi
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c |
12 matches
Mail list logo
