On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 12:54 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Thomas Garnier
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Disable the generic address limit check in
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>>> Disable the generic address limit check in favor of an architecture
>>> specific optimized implementation. The generic imp
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> Disable the generic address limit check in favor of an architecture
>> specific optimized implementation. The generic implementation using
>> pending work flags did not work well wit
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> Disable the generic address limit check in favor of an architecture
> specific optimized implementation. The generic implementation using
> pending work flags did not work well with ARM and alignment faults.
>
> The address limit is checked
4 matches
Mail list logo