Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings

2016-10-26 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Linus, On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:07:27PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > > However, it looks like the first patch from this serie is missing from > > your tree, is there a reason for that? > > No can you point it out? Sure: http://l

Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings

2016-10-25 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > However, it looks like the first patch from this serie is missing from > your tree, is there a reason for that? No can you point it out? > Also, in order to preserve bisectability, could you create an > immutable branch for those sunxi pat

Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings

2016-10-24 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Linus, On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:03:59AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, > > even though we still support the old one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > >

Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings

2016-10-23 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, > even though we still support the old one. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > Acked-by: Rob Herring Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij