On Thursday 12 September 2013 04:44 AM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
Hi Kumar,
I was waiting until after the 3.12 merge window to queue this patch, but
Xenia noticed that the xhci_readl functions can completely go away and
be replaced by standard readl/writel operations. She's posted a
patchset to do tha
Hi Kumar,
I was waiting until after the 3.12 merge window to queue this patch, but
Xenia noticed that the xhci_readl functions can completely go away and
be replaced by standard readl/writel operations. She's posted a
patchset to do that:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=137874983529708&w=2
I ha
On Tuesday 03 September 2013 09:34 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
I'm confused. I said the last version of this patch didn't apply
against usb-next, and you should rebase it. Why did you put "No Change"
in the subject prefix?
I miss understood what Dan said. he said me to add no change if there's
no c
I'm confused. I said the last version of this patch didn't apply
against usb-next, and you should rebase it. Why did you put "No Change"
in the subject prefix?
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:02:45PM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
> This patch redefine function xhci_readl. xhci_readl function doesn't use
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:59:59AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
> I tried applying this patch on linux-next and it applies well.
> i used
> git apply --apply
>
The merge window is open. No one is applying patches until -rc1 comes
out.
This one is not redone in the right way. The subject is w
I tried applying this patch on linux-next and it applies well.
i used
git apply --apply
On Saturday 31 August 2013 11:02 PM, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
This patch redefine function xhci_readl. xhci_readl function doesn't use
xhci_hcd argument.
Hence there is no need of keeping it in the function
6 matches
Mail list logo
