Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: fix debug prints relevant to PCI devices

2014-09-23 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:56:01AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> > This doesn't require any coordination with the PCI core, so I was just >> > leaving this up to t

Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: fix debug prints relevant to PCI devices

2014-09-23 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:56:01AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > This doesn't require any coordination with the PCI core, so I was just > > leaving this up to the arch. But I guess I can at least give you my > > opinion

Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: fix debug prints relevant to PCI devices

2014-09-23 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:56:01AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > This doesn't require any coordination with the PCI core, so I was just > leaving this up to the arch. But I guess I can at least give you my > opinion :) However, PCI core people have more knowledge of the issues here than I do. >

Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: fix debug prints relevant to PCI devices

2014-09-23 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Vidya Sagar wrote: > From: Vidya Sagar > > As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature > is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print > that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when > there is a PCIe device found on the bus > > Signed-

Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: fix debug prints relevant to PCI devices

2014-09-11 Thread vidya sagar
Anyone ??? On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Vidya Sagar wrote: > From: Vidya Sagar > > As per PCIe spec, fast back-to-back transactions feature > is not applicable to PCIe devices. Hence, do not print > that fast back-to-back trasactions are disabled when > there is a PCIe device found on the bus