Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: enable runtime PM for I2C adapter devices enumerated from ACPI

2013-10-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 11:09:01AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > It looks like Windows actually powers the I2C controller off independently > of the I2C client power state. We should probably do the same in Linux even > though it is not following what the ACPI spec says (but makes sense with > s

Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: enable runtime PM for I2C adapter devices enumerated from ACPI

2013-10-05 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 04:09:42PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > The ACPI specification requires the parent device to be powered on before > any of its children. It can be only powered off when all the children are > already off. > > Currently whenever there is no I2C traffic going on, the I2C c

Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: enable runtime PM for I2C adapter devices enumerated from ACPI

2013-10-01 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 04:09:42 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > The ACPI specification requires the parent device to be powered on before > any of its children. It can be only powered off when all the children are > already off. > > Currently whenever there is no I2C traffic going on, the I2C co