Re: [PATCH v4] iio: accel: mma8452: improvements to handle multiple events

> Am 23.08.2017 02:29 schrieb Harinath Nampally: > If rising: use transient OR ff_mt device-dependent like before. But now save > it in a simple flag, > whether transient registers are available. > Ok, is it good idea to add the flag to struct mma_chip_info like below? > * @mma_scales:

Re: [PATCH v4] iio: accel: mma8452: improvements to handle multiple events

Am 23.08.2017 02:29 schrieb Harinath Nampally: If rising: use transient OR ff_mt device-dependent like before. But now save it in a simple flag, whether transient registers are available. Ok, is it good idea to add the flag to struct mma_chip_info like below? * @mma_scales:

Re: [PATCH v4] iio: accel: mma8452: improvements to handle multiple events

If rising: use transient OR ff_mt device-dependent like before. But now save it in a simple flag, whether transient registers are available. Ok, is it good idea to add the flag to struct mma_chip_info like below? * @mma_scales:scale factors for converting register v

Re: [PATCH v4] iio: accel: mma8452: improvements to handle multiple events

Thanks. I may have missed something, but I'm concerned about only one thing: devices without transient event registers. See my comments below. Am 20.08.2017 18:06 schrieb Harinath Nampally: This driver supports multiple devices like mma8653, mma8652, mma8452, mma8453 and fxls8471. Almost al