在 2013-02-19二的 23:00 -0800，David Rientjes写道：
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote:
>
> > Yes, I know there's no new changes in my patch as I said before(not
> > based on lasted), but as I try to apply my patch(1/4), it will do
> > the right work to move current srat.c from arch/x86/mm/ to
> > arc
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote:
> Yes, I know there's no new changes in my patch as I said before(not
> based on lasted), but as I try to apply my patch(1/4), it will do
> the right work to move current srat.c from arch/x86/mm/ to
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/ regardless of what I based is not late
在 2013-02-19二的 19:04 -0800，David Rientjes写道：
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote:
>
> > > > No, it doesn't. From next-20130219, you're missing at least two
> > > > patches:
> > > >
> > > > 3795e4893203 ("acpi, memory-hotplug: extend movablemem_map ranges to
> > > > the end of node")
> > > >
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote:
> > > No, it doesn't. From next-20130219, you're missing at least two patches:
> > >
> > > 3795e4893203 ("acpi, memory-hotplug: extend movablemem_map ranges to the
> > > end of node")
> > > 9a561f4dfd70 ("acpi, memory-hotplug: support getting hotplug info fr
在 2013-02-20三的 10:21 +0800，li guang写道：
> 在 2013-02-19二的 18:08 -0800，David Rientjes写道：
> > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote:
> >
> > > > > This doesn't apply to Linus' tree nor does it apply to linux-next.
> > > > > Which
> > > > > tree are you basing this on?
> > > >
> > > > I did based on
在 2013-02-19二的 18:08 -0800，David Rientjes写道：
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote:
>
> > > > This doesn't apply to Linus' tree nor does it apply to linux-next.
> > > > Which
> > > > tree are you basing this on?
> > >
> > > I did based on linux-next,
> > > but it seems without commit 479a99a8
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, li guang wrote:
> > > This doesn't apply to Linus' tree nor does it apply to linux-next. Which
> > > tree are you basing this on?
> >
> > I did based on linux-next,
> > but it seems without commit 479a99a8e510c8839e0d3d3de8391f8bc61b9760
> > which you may want to see.
> >
在 2013-02-20三的 09:39 +0800，li guang写道：
> 在 2013-02-19二的 13:21 -0800，David Rientjes写道：
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, liguang wrote:
> >
> > > srat table should present only on acpi domain,
> > > seems mm/ is not the right place for it.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> > > Signed-off-by: li
在 2013-02-19二的 13:21 -0800，David Rientjes写道：
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, liguang wrote:
>
> > srat table should present only on acpi domain,
> > seems mm/ is not the right place for it.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> > Signed-off-by: liguang
>
> This doesn't apply to Linus' tree nor does
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, liguang wrote:
> srat table should present only on acpi domain,
> seems mm/ is not the right place for it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> Signed-off-by: liguang
This doesn't apply to Linus' tree nor does it apply to linux-next. Which
tree are you basing this on?
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
