On 5/16/2025 3:22 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025, Dapeng Mi wrote:
>> On 5/15/2025 8:37 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
index 153972e944eb..eba086ef5eca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
+++ b
On Thu, May 15, 2025, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> On 5/15/2025 8:37 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> >> index 153972e944eb..eba086ef5eca 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> >> @@ -198,12 +198,20 @@ sta
On 5/15/2025 8:37 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This is not an optimization in any sane interpretation of that word.
Yes, maybe clean up or bug fix is more accurate.
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
>> From: Dapeng Mi
>>
>> Currently pmu->global_ctrl is initialized in the com
This is not an optimization in any sane interpretation of that word.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> From: Dapeng Mi
>
> Currently pmu->global_ctrl is initialized in the common kvm_pmu_refresh()
> helper since both Intel and AMD CPUs set enable bits for all GP counters
> for PERF_GL
4 matches
Mail list logo