On Thu Aug 15, 2024 at 9:34 PM EEST, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon Aug 12, 2024 at 11:25 AM EEST, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:38:59PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > > Ditto.
> >
> > Just to be sure: I assume this means "Fixes should be in the head of the
> > ser
On Mon Aug 12, 2024 at 11:25 AM EEST, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:38:59PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> > Ditto.
>
> Just to be sure: I assume this means "Fixes should be in the head of the
> series so please reorder"? If yes, please see my reply in the other email
> [
On Mon, 2024-08-12 at 01:32 -0700, Kuvaiskii, Dmitrii wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 11:19:22AM +, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
> > > TLDR: I can add similar handling to sgx_enclave_modify_types() if
> > > reviewers insist, but I don't see how this data race can ever be
> > > triggered by benign real
On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 11:19:22AM +, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > TLDR: I can add similar handling to sgx_enclave_modify_types() if
> > reviewers insist, but I don't see how this data race can ever be
> > triggered by benign real-world SGX applications.
>
> So as mentioned above, I intend to suggest
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:38:59PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Ditto.
Just to be sure: I assume this means "Fixes should be in the head of the
series so please reorder"? If yes, please see my reply in the other email
[1].
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240812082128.3084051-1-dmitrii.kuva
On Fri, 2024-08-09 at 02:35 -0700, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 01:21:56PM +1200, Huang, Kai wrote:
> >
> > > Two enclave threads may try to add and remove the same enclave page
> > > simultaneously (e.g., if the SGX runtime supports both lazy allocation
> > > and MADV_DONTNE
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 01:21:56PM +1200, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
> > Two enclave threads may try to add and remove the same enclave page
> > simultaneously (e.g., if the SGX runtime supports both lazy allocation
> > and MADV_DONTNEED semantics). Consider some enclave page added to the
> > enclave. Use
On 5/07/2024 7:45 pm, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii wrote:
Two enclave threads may try to add and remove the same enclave page
simultaneously (e.g., if the SGX runtime supports both lazy allocation
and MADV_DONTNEED semantics). Consider some enclave page added to the
enclave. User space decides to tempora
On Fri Jul 5, 2024 at 10:45 AM EEST, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii wrote:
> Two enclave threads may try to add and remove the same enclave page
> simultaneously (e.g., if the SGX runtime supports both lazy allocation
> and MADV_DONTNEED semantics). Consider some enclave page added to the
> enclave. User space
On Fri, 05 Jul 2024 02:45:24 -0500, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii
wrote:
Two enclave threads may try to add and remove the same enclave page
simultaneously (e.g., if the SGX runtime supports both lazy allocation
and MADV_DONTNEED semantics). Consider some enclave page added to the
enclave. User space dec
10 matches
Mail list logo
