On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 05:04:02PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:39:53PM +, Popa, Stefan Serban wrote:
> > On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
> > > this mode of operation w
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:39:53PM +, Popa, Stefan Serban wrote:
> On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
> > this mode of operation when I reviewed an earlier version, I didn't
> > notice a reply on that
On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Stefan Popa wrote:
>
> >
> > + if (!regmap_volatile(map, reg) || !regmap_readable(map, reg))
> > {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> I suggested having an ex
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:04:44PM +0300, Stefan Popa wrote:
> + if (!regmap_volatile(map, reg) || !regmap_readable(map, reg)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
this mode of oper
4 matches
Mail list logo
