Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] tracing: fprobe: rethook: Use ftrace_regs instead of pt_regs

On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 18:14:35 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 17:12:07 -0700 > Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:21 PM Masami Hiramatsu > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thus, what I need is to make fprobe to use function-graph tracer's shadow >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] tracing: fprobe: rethook: Use ftrace_regs instead of pt_regs

On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 17:12:07 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:21 PM Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > > > > Thus, what I need is to make fprobe to use function-graph tracer's shadow > > stack and trampoline instead of rethook. This may need to generalize its > > interface

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] tracing: fprobe: rethook: Use ftrace_regs instead of pt_regs

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:21 PM Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > Thus, what I need is to make fprobe to use function-graph tracer's shadow > stack and trampoline instead of rethook. This may need to generalize its > interface so that we can share it between fprobe and function-graph tracer, > but we

Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] tracing: fprobe: rethook: Use ftrace_regs instead of pt_regs

Hi, While revising the LPC slides, I realized that this series is actually slightly going in the wrong direction. My goal is to unify "the shadow stack and the trampoline" for function exit tracing (function graph tracer and function return probe event), but not only unifying the internal interfa