Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-03 Thread Daniel Santos
On 10/01/2012 03:47 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:41:14 -0500 > Daniel Santos wrote: > >> I can rebase against whatever you like and send either corrections or an >> updated patch set. Just tell me what works please. > I dropped everything - let's start again. I would have sent

Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Santos
Andrew, I'm really sorry for the debacle of this round of patches. It turns out that my patches weren't reaching LKML because my recipient list was too large and the server was tagging it as spam, so none of these patches you committed ever made it to LKML. :( To fix that, I broke the 25 patches

Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:41:14 -0500 Daniel Santos wrote: > I can rebase against whatever you like and send either corrections or an > updated patch set. Just tell me what works please. I dropped everything - let's start again. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ker

Re: [PATCH v6 0/25] Generic Red-Black Trees

2012-10-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:54:16 -0500 Daniel Santos wrote: > This patch set improves on Andrea Arcangeli's original Red-Black Tree > implementation by adding generic search and insert functions with > complete support for: I grabbed patches 1-7, but I don't expect to send them in for 3.7. It's not