On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:32 PM, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
> Kees,
>
>
> On 08/27/2014 02:46 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:19:13AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/22/2014 01:47 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:56 AM, AKASHI Takahiro
Kees,
On 08/27/2014 02:46 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:19:13AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 08/22/2014 01:47 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:56 AM, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
To allow tracer to be able to change/skip a system call by re-writing
a syscall n
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:19:13AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On 08/22/2014 01:47 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:56 AM, AKASHI Takahiro
> > wrote:
> >> To allow tracer to be able to change/skip a system call by re-writing
> >> a syscall number, there are several approaches
On 08/22/2014 01:47 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:56 AM, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
To allow tracer to be able to change/skip a system call by re-writing
a syscall number, there are several approaches:
(1) modify x8 register with ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET), and handle this case
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:56 AM, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
> To allow tracer to be able to change/skip a system call by re-writing
> a syscall number, there are several approaches:
>
> (1) modify x8 register with ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET), and handle this case
> later on in syscall_trace_enter(),
5 matches
Mail list logo