On 27/11/17 05:56, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 06:47:52AM +, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
+ * -ENOTCONN: If the transmitted message was not ACKed by destination
+ * device.
I am preferring ENODATA in SDW for this case, as Slaves didnt respond or
ACK.
Isn't that a ti
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 06:47:52AM +, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> >>+ * -ENOTCONN: If the transmitted message was not ACKed by destination
> >>+ * device.
> >
> >I am preferring ENODATA in SDW for this case, as Slaves didnt respond or
> >ACK.
> Isn't that a timeout error then.
>
> ENODATA is
thanks for the comments,
On 17/11/17 07:48, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:10:36PM +, srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org wrote:
+void slim_msg_response(struct slim_controller *ctrl, u8 *reply, u8 tid, u8 len)
+{
+ struct slim_msg_txn *txn;
+ struct slim_val_inf *msg;
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 02:10:36PM +, srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org wrote:
> +void slim_msg_response(struct slim_controller *ctrl, u8 *reply, u8 tid, u8
> len)
> +{
> + struct slim_msg_txn *txn;
> + struct slim_val_inf *msg;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(
4 matches
Mail list logo
