On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:58:30AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
> > PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
> > Tested
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
> PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
> Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig| 19 +++-
>
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:26:02PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > I don't even understand why you want to create a generic
> > > pci_address_to_pio
> > > implementation, when we don't need that for arm64 at all. Unless I'm
> > > missing something
On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > I don't even understand why you want to create a generic pci_address_to_pio
> > implementation, when we don't need that for arm64 at all. Unless I'm
> > missing something important, that function is only called in case of
> > PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE with
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:17:22AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:37:51PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > >
> > > > My ultimate point is that no matter how lon
On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:37:51PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > >
> > > My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue about the shape of
> > > the functions that
> > > I've added
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:37:51PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >
> > My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue about the shape of
> > the functions that
> > I've added into arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c I don't think we can get away
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 17:21:41 Liviu Dudau wrote:
>
> My ultimate point is that no matter how long we argue about the shape of the
> functions that
> I've added into arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c I don't think we can get away without
> having that
> file, or at least not in the first phase if we
On Wednesday 19 March 2014 12:53:11 Rob Herring wrote:
> I've successfully used the preceeding series on ARM converting the
> Versatile PCI support to use it. The main part of the process was just
> copying this arm64 code to arm which tells me the code is in the wrong
> place. There are still some
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:56:19PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:56:19PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +0
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:05:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Friday 14 March 2014, Cata
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 05:38:21PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +,
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:05:38PM +, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
> > PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
> > Tested-by: Tanm
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Use the generic host bridge functions to provide support for
> PCI Express on arm64. There is no support for ISA memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau
> Tested-by: Tanmay Inamdar
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig| 19 +++-
> arch/arm
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 20:10 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > As for the other two functions, I've no special attachment to where they
> > are present
> > and I'm happy to move them into drivers/pci on the condition that the
> > patchset doesn't
> > double in size. The reason why I'm weary of touch
On Friday 14 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >
>
> I haven't seen any reaction from Bjorn on this, so I threaded carefully on
> that
> subject. I'm new to this so I don't know how to handle this.
>
> To my mind, and looking at the way every architecture has been setup, the
> pcibios_*
> funct
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > [...]
> > > +int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address, r
On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> [...]
> > +int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address, resource_size_t size)
> [...]
> > +unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_add
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
[...]
> +int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address, resource_size_t size)
[...]
> +unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address)
[...]
> +void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *b
21 matches
Mail list logo
